Adidas and Reebok: Is Acquiring Easier than Integrating? | SpringerLink
PDF) Is the law of trade marks expanding without proper justification? | Karolina Dereczenik - Academia.edu
Israeli Legislature Cited
European Court of Justice, 23 October 2003, Adidas v Fitnessworld
Adidas - Wikipedia
Sentenza 408 01 adidas - Docsity
The genie is out of the bottle: the ECJ's decision in L'Oréal v Bellure
European Union: Protecting well-known marks under international treaties - Lexology
European Court of Justice, 23 October 2003, Adidas v Fitnessworld
INTEL CORP INC v CPM UNITED KINGDOM LTD
Case C-408/01 Adidas-Salomon AG, formerly Adidas AG and Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd
Trade Mark Inter-partes Decision O/232/08
An evaluation of the view: “Dilution should be recognized as a form of damage in passing off as it is in the law of registered trade marks.” — KIIPS
European Court of Justice, 23 October 2003, Adidas v Fitnessworld
adidas salomon 3 – adidasi asics pret barbati balenciaga femei cumpărare
An evaluation of the view: "Dilution should be recognized as a form of damage in passing off as it is in the law of registered trade marks." — KIIPS
3rd Year IP Coursework
Adidas Salomon High Resolution Stock Photography and Images - Alamy
Department of Law LW3081/LW3082 Intellectual Property “Is it infringing just to tell the truth?”
Adidas Salomon High Resolution Stock Photography and Images - Alamy
Argos goes to the Court of Appeal but leaves empty handed - The IPKat
SENTENZA DELLA CORTE (Sesta Sezione) 23 ottobre 2003 * Nel procedimento C-408/01, avente ad oggetto una domanda di pronuncia pre
Trademark Protection – a rewarding investment? – Zai blogs
